MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017197308 · doi:10.4141/s03-024

Nitrogen mineralization and uptake by ryegrass in a clay loam soil amended with composts or liquid pig manure

2004· article· en· W2017197308 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yang Xue-ming, C. F. Drury, W. D. Reynolds, C. S. Tan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNematode management and characterization studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMineralization (soil science)LoamAmendmentCompostManureAgronomyLolium perenneStrawChemistrySoil waterDenitrificationNitrificationNitrogenFertilizerAnimal scienceNitrogen cycleEnvironmental sciencePoaceaeBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although composted liquid pig manure is increasingly being applied to agricultural soils, little is known about its impacts on N dynamics (mineralization, denitrification, immobilization, and plant uptake) in the crop root zone compared to liquid pig manure (LPM) or other types of composts. A greenhouse pot experiment was conducted to determine N mineralization and plant uptake in a ryegrass-cropped clay loam soil that had been amended with either LPM, LPM + wheat straw compost (PMS), or yard waste compost (YWC). Over a 20-wk growth period, plant biomass was increased relative to the control by 164% for LPM, 64.3% for YWC, and 39.6% for PMS. However, the recovery of amendment N in the ryegrass was low and variable at 3.3% for PMS (12.7 mg N kg -1 ), 3.7% for YWC (21.5 mg N kg -1 ), and 15.3% for LPM (90.9 mg N kg -1 ). Although gains and losses of mineral N occurred primarily within the first 8 wk, assimilation of amendment N by the ryegrass appeared to continue throughout the entire growth period. High amounts of inorganic N present in the LP M treatment led to the greatest loss of N, as N 2 O, through denitrification and nitrification (39.1 mg N kg -1 ). This was 35 times greater than the YWC treatment (1.1 mg N kg -1 ), over 50 times greater than the N 2 O loss from the PMS treatment (0.7 mg N kg -1 ) and over 76 times greater than the N 2 O loss from the control (0.5 mg N kg -1 ). There was a net gain in mineral and plant assimilated N from mineralization with the control (6.4 mg N kg -1 ) and YWC treatments (8.8 mg N kg -1 ) over 20 wk. However, there was a small decrease in mineral and plant assimilated N with the PMS treatment (4.3 mg N kg -1 ) and a large decrease with the LPM treatment (90.1 mg N kg -1 ). From an environmental perspective, the large amount of N 2 O generated by the LPM treatment compromises the usefulness of LPM as a source of crop-available N. Key words: Compost, pig manure, ryegrass, swine, hog, nitrogen mineralization

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score0.701

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicNematode management and characterization studiesFrench-language works237,207