High diversity in<i>Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens</i>pv.<i>flaccumfaciens</i>characterized by serology and rep-PCR genomic fingerprinting
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The diversity found in culture collection strains of Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens was characterized by serology and repetitive-sequence-based polymerase chain reaction (rep-PCR). Using strain NCPPB 559 as the reference antigen, immunofluorescence tests with polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies confirmed that no epitope appeared to be common to all strains of this pathovar. Screening of hybridoma cell lines againsl strains of this pathovar, as well as against other members of this genus and species, identified two distinct epitopes. Phylogenetic analysis of the rep-PCR genomic fingerprints of Curtobacter, Clavibacter, and Rathayibacter species, grouped all the C. flaccumfaciens strains and pathovars together, but the C. flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens strains did not form a single cluster. Rather, they dispersed into two clusters, along with strains of other pathovars of this species. Members of one cluster reacted with one of the monoclonal antibodies, while members of the other did not.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it