APTF
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of a new radiographic measurement of the distal tibia and fibula on the lateral view of the ankle in normal adults: the anteroposterior tibiofibular (APTF) ratio. METHOD: Thirty adults without history of trauma or disease of the ankle were included. Bilateral ankles were x-rayed with a true lateral view of the ankle. A line from the anterior tibial physis scar to the posterior tibial cortex, passing by the intersection of the physis and the fibula anterior cortex, was drawn. The APTF ratio was calculated as the ratio of the anterior segment to the posterior segment. The measurements were done by 3 independent evaluators. Intra- and interobserver reliability was obtained using intraclass correlation. RESULTS: The APTF ratio was 0.94 ± 0.13 with a range of 0.63-1.31. Sex and age had no effect on the results. Inter- and intraobserver reliability was good to very good with an intraclass correlation between 0.6 and 0.8. A strong correlation between the left and the right APTF ratio was observed (r = 0.501 and P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The distal tibiofibular joint anatomy in the sagittal plane can be accurately assessed with a new reliable radiographic measurement, the APTF ratio. The reduction of this joint during surgery can be confirmed with a true lateral view of the ankle. The anterior fibula cortex crosses the tibial physeal scar at the center of the line crossing this point and the anterior cortex of the tibia at the level of the physeal scar in the normal ankle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".