MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017279814 · doi:10.12968/ijtr.2005.12.4.18261

Thinking outside the bed: Managing interface pressure

2005· article· en· W2017279814 on OpenAlexaff
Linda Norton, Laurie M. Rappl, Gary Sibbald

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHome and Community Care Support Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBed restRest (music)MedicineMuscle atrophyIntensive care medicineCompliance (psychology)Physical medicine and rehabilitationHigh pressurePhysical therapyAtrophySurgeryPsychologyCardiologyInternal medicineEngineeringSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bed rest has often been prescribed as a treatment for pressure ulcers. However, clients have expressed difficulty complying with this. It is clear that bed rest can cause a number of complications, including muscle atrophy, urinary tract infections, pulmonary emboli and decreased cardiac reserve, while there is no compelling evidence that bed rest is effective in the treatment of pressure ulcers. The long list of potential complications has highlighted a number of issues, including whether or not bed rest is an effective treatment and the difference between compliance, adherence and coherence. A comprehensive assessment will guide the choice of managing interface pressure. To address these issues, this article will provide an overview of the wound healing paradigm, explore whether or not bed rest is an effective treatment for pressure ulcers and examine alternatives for managing pressure throughout the client’s activities of daily living.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Therapy and RehabilitationSame topicPressure Ulcer Prevention and ManagementFrench-language works237,207