MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017310350 · doi:10.2113/econgeo.108.8.1833

Sulfide Saturation and Magma Emplacement in the Formation of the Permian Huangshandong Ni-Cu Sulfide Deposit, Xinjiang, Northwestern China

2013· article· en· W2017310350 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Geology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsVale (Canada)
FundersChinese Academy of Geological SciencesNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaBayer CanadaExploratory Research Center on Life and Living Systems, National Institutes of Natural SciencesChinese Academy of Sciences
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryMineralization (soil science)SulfideLayered intrusionMaficPyrrhotiteChalcopyriteUltramafic rockPyriteChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The eastern Tianshan orogenic belt, northwestern China, hosts ~120 mafic-ultramafic intrusions and at least six of them host significant Ni-Cu sulfide mineralization of which the Permian Huangshandong intrusion is the largest. The mafic-ultramafic rocks of the Huangshandong intrusion comprise lherzolite, gabbronorite, gabbro, and diorite. Individual orebodies are composed of pyrrhotite, pentlandite, and chalcopyrite as disseminated to net-textured or massive to semimassive sulfide mineralization. Oxide-bearing sulfide mineralization contains 1 to 5% magmatic magnetite that has ilmenite and spinel exsolution lamellae. Silicate rocks and sulfide mineralization have variable whole-rock platinum group elements (PGE; 0.38–362 ppb), Cu (42–97,000 ppm), and Ni (26–33,000 ppm) concentrations. The mineralization is broken out into two types termed oxide rich and oxide poor. The oxide-rich sulfide mineralization has high PGE concentrations with low 187Re/188Os ratios (38.9–151), whereas oxide-poor sulfide mineralization has low PGE concentrations with high 187Re/188Os (159–781). Both oxide-rich and -poor sulfide mineralization have highly variable γ Os values (49–189 and 30–278, respectively). Oxide-rich sulfide mineralization contains magnetite with variable amounts of MgO, TiO2, Al2O3, FeOtotal, Cr, V, Zn, and Sn, indicating that they crystallized from different stages during magma differentiation. We propose that the host intrusion and associated sulfide mineralization were derived from high Mg basaltic magmas from a mantle source that was previously modified by subducted oceanic slab. Oxide-poor sulfide mineralization of the Huangshandong intrusion formed from a magma that underwent <0.03% sulfide removal before emplacement and was thus PGE depleted. Oxide-rich sulfide mineralization formed from magma that had much lower amounts of sulfide (<0.003%) removed in the early stage before entering the Huangshandong magma chamber. An early sulfide saturation event was likely associated with fractionation of silicate minerals in a deep-staging magma chamber. The second sulfide saturation event that formed the sulfide mineralization was probably triggered by selective crustal contamination and fractionation in the high-level chamber where mixing of magmas and accumulation of immiscible sulfide occurred.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it