Prevalence and Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy in Northwest Cameroon as Identified by Teleophthalmology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Diabetic retinopathy is a common ocular complication of diabetes mellitus, which can lead to significant visual impairment. The present study is the first to characterize the prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy and other ocular pathologies in a population of patients with diabetes who live in Northwest Cameroon using teleophthalmology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of the electronic charts of patients at the Banso Baptist Hospital and in neighboring communities between July 1, 2007 and June 30, 2008 was completed. The eyes of 253 consecutive patients with diabetes mellitus who attended mobile teleophthalmology clinics in Northwest Cameroon were included in the study. Eyes were graded for diabetic retinopathy using stereoscopic seven-field digital retinal images obtained by a mobile team in Cameroon and graded by ophthalmologists in Canada utilizing Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study criteria. RESULTS: Diabetic retinopathy was identified in 20.6% of eyes (18.2% nonproliferative, 2.4% proliferative) and in 24.3% of patients. About 8.0% of eyes demonstrated evidence of macular edema. Additional nondiabetes-related ocular pathologies were identified in 14.6% of eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic retinopathy was found to be common in people with diabetes who attended teleophthalmology clinics in Northwest Cameroon. The prevalence of treatable disease including macular edema and retinal neovascularization suggests that improved patient access to laser photocoagulation and vitreoretinal surgery would be beneficial in reducing vision loss in this vulnerable population. As the prevalence of diabetes increases across sub-Saharan Africa, the challenge of diagnosing and managing the complications of diabetes will increase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".