Bibliographic record
Abstract
CACDS, CAPDM, CGPA, CMA, CPhA, and Rx&D to join them, the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, and the group purchasing organizations HealthPRO and Medbuy in forming the Multi-Stakeholder Steering Committee on Drug Shortages, for collaborative numbers on preventing and mitigating shortages across Canada.CSHP performed a pas de deux with its British Columbia Branch to raise public awareness of the expected consequences for the health care system of the provincial government's plan to remove a market wage adjustment for hospital pharmacists.The duo also executed an awe-inspiring move, with CSHP lifting the BC Branch's graceful video on the value of hospital pharmacists and carrying it to CSHP Council.The video, now available to all branches (www.cshp.ca/advocacy/index_e.asp), can be used to showcase hospital pharmacists to the public, politicians and government officials.The Canadian Hospital Pharmacy Residency Board waltzed into a reception at the 2012 Professional Practice Conference to celebrate its 50th anniversary.In 1956, Isabel Stauffer proposed that the Canadian Conference of Pharmaceutical Faculties partner with CSHP to establish minimum standards for pharmacy internships in hospitals, and 1962 saw the establishment of the first Residency Board, consisting of Isabel Stauffer, Orest Buchko, Phyllis Yagi, André Archambault, and Glen Moir.You can view a slide presentation recounting key events in the Board's history at www.cshp.ca/programs/residencyTraining/CHPRBinfo_e.asp.In addition to its time-honoured research grant competition, the CSHP Foundation choreographed new rock 'n' rolling education grant opportunities.Two competitions were launched in the fall for innovative approaches to professional education, dialogue, and knowledge transfer, to improve the delivery of patient care in hospitals and collaborative health care settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.019 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.016 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.022 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.244 | 0.174 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".