Queueing model for heterogeneous opportunistic spectrum access
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we propose a queueing model to analyse the performance of an opportunistic spectrum access (OSA) system with service interruptions operating over heterogeneous channels in which the service transmission rate and the service interruption rate after the transmission is resumed are generally different than their value prior to the interruption. We first propose Markov chain models to analyse this system under memoryless service time and availability periods. On the basis of simplification assumptions, we also provide an analytical z ‐Transform analysis of the Markov models. The Markov model and approximations are validated with accurate system simulations. We also provide numerical results illustrating the non‐convex relations between the traffic metrics and system parameters and that the proposed models are essential for optimal OSA network planning and operation. We further analyse and discuss the OSA queueing model for general distribution of service time and availability periods. The analytical and simulation results indicate that for usual system parameters, the queue average occupancy is similar for different distributions of service time and availability periods and that the memoryless Markov models can be used to accurately predict the heterogeneous OSA system traffic performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".