The modeling of the radiation and response Green’s function of a fluid-loaded cylindrical shell with an external compliant layer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scattering and radiation of acoustic waves from a fluid-loaded cylindrical shell with an external compliant layer are of interest. The compliant layer can be modeled by a normally reacting impedance layer, which has the advantage that complex compliant layer geometries, such as partial compliant layers, can be considered. A question may, however, arise as to the accuracy of this approach. A more rigorous approach is to model the elastic shell and compliant layer using a multilayer shell theory, which has the disadvantage that it cannot be extended to consider partial layers. In this paper scattering results from the normally reacting compliant layer model are compared to those from the multilayer shell model to show that the two approaches produce similar results, except for thickness resonances of the compliant layer. Having established the consistency between the two approaches, results for the far-field acoustic radiation as a function of frequency and radiation angle for a fluid-loaded shell with an external compliant layer excited by an internal ring force are obtained using the normally reacting impedance layer model. These results clearly show the reduction in the far field radiation due to the presence of the compliant layer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".