MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017547394 · doi:10.1002/hipo.1046

β‐Adrenergic blockade in the dentate gyrus in vivo prevents high frequency‐induced long‐term potentiation of EPSP slope, but not long‐term potentiation of population spike amplitude

2001· article· en· W2017547394 on OpenAlexaff
Catherine A. Munro, Susan G. Walling, John H. Evans, Carolyn W. Harley

Bibliographic record

VenueHippocampus · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLong-term potentiationPopulation spikeExcitatory postsynaptic potentialDentate gyrusNeuroscienceChemistryPopulationHippocampusBiologyMedicineReceptorInhibitory postsynaptic potentialBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High frequency (HF)-induced and norepinephrine (NE)-induced long-term potentiation have been hypothesized to utilize common mechanisms of induction and expression in the dentate gyrus. In vitro data tend to support this hypothesis, but few studies have been done in vivo. The present study records perforant path-evoked potentials simultaneously on two micropipettes, one filled with saline and the other with the beta-antagonist, timolol. Stimulation of the paragigantocellularis nucleus (PGi) was used as a method of producing NE release in the dentate gyrus, and thus, to assess the efficacy of beta-receptor blockade on the timolol pipette. Beta-blockade by timolol attenuated PGi-induced spike potentiation. HF-induced potentiation of the excitatory post-synaptic potential (EPSP) slope was also blocked by timolol, but HF-induced spike amplitude potentiation was unaffected. These results are consistent with an earlier report examining HF-long-term potentiation (LTP) following 6-OHDA-induced NE depletion, which showed that the EPSP slope LTP depended, for its full expression, on NE, but potentiation of the population spike amplitude component of HF-induced LTP did not. In the present study, PGi-induced potentiation of spike amplitude on the saline pipette was normal after HF-induced saturation of spike amplitude potentiation, suggesting that the mechanisms for expression of spike potentiation, as well as induction of spike potentiation, are separate for HF and NE stimulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHippocampusSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207