Is stoping a volumetrically significant pluton emplacement process?: Comment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| July 01, 2008 Is stoping a volumetrically significant pluton emplacement process?: Comment D. Barrie Clarke; D. Barrie Clarke † 1Department of Earth Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5, Canada †E-mail: clarke@dal.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Saskia Erdmann Saskia Erdmann 1Department of Earth Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information D. Barrie Clarke † 1Department of Earth Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5, Canada Saskia Erdmann 1Department of Earth Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5, Canada †E-mail: clarke@dal.ca Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 10 Nov 2006 Revision Received: 27 Apr 2007 Accepted: 28 May 2007 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 © 2008 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (2008) 120 (7-8): 1072–1074. https://doi.org/10.1130/B26147.1 Article history Received: 10 Nov 2006 Revision Received: 27 Apr 2007 Accepted: 28 May 2007 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation D. Barrie Clarke, Saskia Erdmann; Is stoping a volumetrically significant pluton emplacement process?: Comment. GSA Bulletin 2008;; 120 (7-8): 1072–1074. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/B26147.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Glazner and Bartley (2006) have challenged the "large-magma-body-emplaced-by-stoping" model for granite batholiths. Instead, primarily as a consequence of their geochronological data on the Tuolumne Batholith, Glazner and Bartley (2006), building on Glazner et al. (2004) and Coleman et al. (2004), have inferred that plutons grow by a prolonged sequence of magma injections and/or dikes. Such emplacement of magma by dikes, as opposed to emplacement of magma by stoping, is much less likely to produce xenoliths; therefore, the abundances of country-rock xenoliths in granites represent a major problem for the dike emplacement hypothesis, and require that Glazner and Bartley... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.054 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.036 | 0.025 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".