MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017579523 · doi:10.1130/b26147.1

Is stoping a volumetrically significant pluton emplacement process?: Comment

2008· article· en· W2017579523 on OpenAlexaffabout
D. B. Clarke, Saskia Erdmann

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society of America Bulletin · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaCitationLibrary scienceIconNew englandHistoryPolitical scienceArchaeologyLawComputer sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| July 01, 2008 Is stoping a volumetrically significant pluton emplacement process?: Comment D. Barrie Clarke; D. Barrie Clarke † 1Department of Earth Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5, Canada †E-mail: clarke@dal.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Saskia Erdmann Saskia Erdmann 1Department of Earth Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information D. Barrie Clarke † 1Department of Earth Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5, Canada Saskia Erdmann 1Department of Earth Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5, Canada †E-mail: clarke@dal.ca Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 10 Nov 2006 Revision Received: 27 Apr 2007 Accepted: 28 May 2007 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 © 2008 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (2008) 120 (7-8): 1072–1074. https://doi.org/10.1130/B26147.1 Article history Received: 10 Nov 2006 Revision Received: 27 Apr 2007 Accepted: 28 May 2007 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation D. Barrie Clarke, Saskia Erdmann; Is stoping a volumetrically significant pluton emplacement process?: Comment. GSA Bulletin 2008;; 120 (7-8): 1072–1074. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/B26147.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Glazner and Bartley (2006) have challenged the "large-magma-body-emplaced-by-stoping" model for granite batholiths. Instead, primarily as a consequence of their geochronological data on the Tuolumne Batholith, Glazner and Bartley (2006), building on Glazner et al. (2004) and Coleman et al. (2004), have inferred that plutons grow by a prolonged sequence of magma injections and/or dikes. Such emplacement of magma by dikes, as opposed to emplacement of magma by stoping, is much less likely to produce xenoliths; therefore, the abundances of country-rock xenoliths in granites represent a major problem for the dike emplacement hypothesis, and require that Glazner and Bartley... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.054
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.054
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0360.025
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society of America BulletinSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207