Generation of a chirp-free optical pulse train with tunable pulse width based on a polarization modulator and an intensity modulator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A simple method for the generation of a chirp-free optical pulse train with tunable pulse width using a polarization modulator (PolM) and a zero-chirp intensity modulator (IM) is proposed and demonstrated. In the proposed system, a light wave with its polarization direction oriented at an angle of 45 degrees with respect to the principal axis of the PolM is polarization modulated by a sinusoidal drive signal. An optical polarizer is connected after the PolM to convert the polarization-modulated signals to a pulse train with the main peaks having a narrow pulse width. Then, the main peaks are selected by the IM, leading to the generation of a short optical pulse train with a repetition rate that is identical to or twice the frequency of the sinusoidal drive signal, depending on the dc bias of the IM. The pulse width of the generated pulse is easily tuned by adjusting the phase modulation index of the PolM. An experiment is carried out, and a pulse train with a duty cycle as small as 8.16% is generated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".