LIFE HISTORY PHASES AND THE BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE RED ALGA <i>CHONDRUS CRISPUS</i> (RHODOPHYTA)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chondrus crispus Stackhouse alternates between two isomorphic life history phases that differ in cell‐wall phycocolloid composition. It has been long hypothesized that the gametophyte, with strong‐gelling kappa‐type carrageenans, is mechanically superior to the tetrasporophyte, with nongelling lambda‐type carrageenans, which could contribute to the observed gametophytic dominance in many wave‐swept environments. Standard mechanical tests were performed on distal tissues of C. crispus sampled from a range of environments in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, using a tensometer equipped with a video extensometer. Life history phase was by far the most important determinant of mechanical properties, whereas environmental factors had only modest influence (vertical distribution) or no effect (exposure); gametophytic distal tissues were 43% stronger, 21% more extensible, and 21% stiffer than tetrasporophytic distal tissues. However, the superior strength of gametophytic tissues was not evident at the stipe/holdfast junction (where breakage typically occurs), and the two phases were equally susceptible to dislodgment by a given force. The primary ecophysiological role of carrageenans in C. crispus may not be the provision of a structure to resist wave action.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".