Effect of Acupuncture Upon Experimentally Induced Ischemic Pain: A Sham-Controlled Single-Blind Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the hypoalgesic effect of true and sham acupuncture upon experimentally induced ischemic pain. DESIGN: Human volunteers (n = 60) were required to attend two sessions for pain induction using a submaximal effort tourniquet technique; on the first occasion, baseline pain scores were recorded and on the second, 48 hours later, subjects were randomly allocated to one of five groups: Control, Treatment Groups 1 or 2, or Placebo Groups 1 or 2. SUBJECTS: Healthy human volunteers. INTERVENTION: In all the Treatment and Placebo Groups, subjects received some form of needle acupuncture 15 minutes before, and 5 minutes during, the pain induction procedure on the second day. Treatment Group 1 received acupuncture on acupuncture points situated distal to the tourniquet, whereas Treatment Group 2 received acupuncture on acupuncture points situated proximal to the tourniquet. In Placebo Groups 1 and 2, subjects received 'sham' acupuncture either on nonacupuncture points (Placebo Group 1) or on acupuncture points (Placebo Group 2) using (standardized) minimal levels of stimulation. A licensed acupuncturist who was not involved in data collection and analyses carried out all treatments. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain was assessed using a computerized visual analog scale (VAS) and a McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). RESULTS: Analysis of VAS scores using ANOVA revealed no significant differences between groups (e.g., VAS sum of differences data (mean +/- SEM): Treatment Group 1: 90+/-47, Treatment Group 2: 187+/-56, Placebo Group 1: 152+/-40, Placebo Group 2: 121+/-42, CONTROLS: 46+/-24, p>0.05). Analysis of MPQ percentage difference scores using one-way ANOVA revealed some isolated effects in the subjective descriptors and the Pain Rating Index, both for Treatment Group 2 and Placebo Group 2, proving them superior to any of the other groups. CONCLUSION: The results of the study provide no convincing evidence for a superior hypoalgesic effect of acupuncture compared with "sham" procedures on this model of experimental pain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".