MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Molecular cloning and expression of pheromone‐binding protein1 from the diamondback moth, <i>Plutella xylostella</i>

2009· article· en· W2017663879 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Zhichun Zhang, Man‐Qun Wang, Guoan Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Forest ServiceNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNatural Resources CanadaPlant Sciences Institute, Iowa State UniversityU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsPlutellaDiamondback mothBiologyPlutellidaeLepidoptera genitaliaComplementary DNAGenBankGeneticsMolecular biologyGeneBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report on the identification and characterization of a new cDNA encoding the pheromone‐binding protein1 (PxylPBP1) from male antennae of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). The deduced amino acid sequences of PxylPBP1 revealed a mature protein of 164 amino acids, with six cysteine residues in conserved positions relative to other known PBP. The alignment of the mature PxylPBP1 with other Lepidoptera PBP showed high sequence similarity (70–80%) with other full‐length sequences from GenBank. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis revealed that the PxylPBP1 gene is only expressed in antennae. Real‐time PCR further indicated that the expression of PxylPBP1 gene is higher in male moths, and higher in mated moths regardless of gender. The transcription levels of PxylPBP1 gene of unmated male moths reduced with age, and peaked in 4‐h‐old female moths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.733

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEntomologia Experimentalis et ApplicataSame topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchFrench-language works237,207