MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017758746 · doi:10.1504/ijitm.2007.013998

Electronic service delivery in a multi-channel public sector: an assessment of the government of Canada

2007· article· en· W2017758746 on OpenAlex
Jeffrey Roy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Information Technology and Management · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicE-Government and Public Services
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsService delivery frameworkGovernment (linguistics)Service (business)BusinessCorporate governancePublic sectorRelevance (law)Service designOrder (exchange)Public relationsPublic administrationPrivate sectorMarketingPolitical scienceEconomicsEconomic growthFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this article is to provide a critical assessment of both the Canadian federal government's experience to date with online service delivery and the prospects for Service Canada, a new vehicle for government-wide service transformation. In doing so, our primary interest lies in better understanding the organisational dimensions to this transformation and the extent to which these dimensions are both addressed in and well aligned with the federal government apparatus. Upon review of the background to and creation of Service Canada, five major sets of factors are adopted in order to analyse the prospects for this government-wide service transformation initiative. They include the relevance and management of a multi-channel service apparatus; the governance architecture; the importance of management by networks; public-private partnering; and senior management and political support. The article concludes that significant effort is required in each of these areas in order for Service Canada to succeed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it