Ototoxicity of Intratympanic Docusate Sodium and Mineral Oil in the Guinea Pig
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: (1) To evaluate the ototoxic potential of docusate sodium and mineral oil and (2) to compare the cerumenolytic properties of these agents to water and a commercially available product. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective animal study. SETTING: Docusate sodium and mineral oil are being used to dissolve cerumen plugs. Their ototoxicity has never been assessed. METHODS: Nineteen guinea pigs represented 38 ears, which formed 4 groups. Each group was injected with an intratympanic solution once a week for 4 weeks. Group 1 was injected with a negative control solution of saline, group 2 with docusate sodium, group 3 with a positive control solution of gentamicin, and group 4 with mineral oil. Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were recorded before any procedure and 1 week after the final injections. Cochleas were analyzed under scanning electron microscopy. The cerumenolytic properties of water, docusate sodium, mineral oil, and cerumol were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no significant ABR threshold increase for saline or mineral oil. Gentamicin and docusate sodium caused a significant threshold increase that averaged 51.9 dB and 44.9 dB over all the frequencies (P < .001). Electron microscopy could not be performed on the cochleas treated by docusate sodium because of very severe osteitis. All of the agents tested seemed to be effective cerumenolytics compared with no treatment, but water was significantly more effective compared with any of the other tested products (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Docusate sodium was severely ototoxic, and its use should be discouraged. Mineral oil was not ototoxic. Water seemed to be the most effective cerumenolytic agent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".