Neustonic postlarval American lobsters, <i>Homarus americanus</i>, in the western Gulf of Maine: spatial and interannual variations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examined the seasonal abundance of postlarval (PL) (stage IV) American lobsters, Homarus americanus, from neuston samples from 1989 to 1995 at Johns Bay, Maine, and Seabrook, New Hampshire, located 150 km apart in the western Gulf of Maine. The postlarval season at these sites began between approximately days of the year 180 and 210 and ranged from about 35 to 70 days in duration. Within years, start and end dates were similar for the two sites. Maximum concentrations from single tows exceeded 100 PL·1000 m-2, but 85% or more of the positive tows had concentrations <15 PL·1000 m-2 and more than half had <5 PL·1000 m-2. These concentrations occurred at high levels of the stock, were the source for continued high recruitment in the 1990s, and thereby form a benchmark for future measurements. Only one of the seven years showed a major decline in seasonal abundance, and it occurred at both sites. Of the remaining years, three had nearly identical integrated abundances at both sites (approximately 200 PL· 1000 m-2·year-1). A survey in the western Gulf of Maine caught postlarvae out to 56 km offshore at concentrations similar to the coastal samples, indicating a broadly distributed source of potential recruits to the benthic population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".