MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017836313 · doi:10.1139/v05-104

Surface organometallic chemistry Carbonyl complexes of Re(I) with silanolates as models of silica anchored rhenium carbonyl species

2005· article· en· W2017836313 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Giuseppe D’Alfonso, Claudia Dragonetti, Simona Galli, Elena Lucenti, Piero Macchi, Dominique Roberto, Renato Ugo

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryRheniumTrifluoromethanesulfonateTriphenylphosphineElectrophileSilylationMedicinal chemistryGroup 2 organometallic chemistryReactivity (psychology)MoleculeOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reaction of Me3SiONa with [Re(CO)5Cl] affords the new complex Na[Re2(CO)6(µ-OSiMe3)3], which could be generated via formation of [Re(CO)5OSiMe3] followed by immediate reaction with Me3SiO–. Substitution of some CO ligands by phosphines significantly decreases the electrophilicity of the Re(I) center, and therefore hinders further attack by Me3SiO–. Thus, fac-[Re(CO)3(Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2)OTf] (OTf is the triflate anion) reacts with Me3SiONa to give fac-[Re(CO)3(Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2)OSiMe3], a molecular model of silica anchored [Re(CO)5OSi≡]. However, substitution of only one CO by triphenylphosphine is not enough to avoid the formation of [Re2(CO)6(µ-OSiMe3)3]–. While fac-[Re(CO)3(Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2)OSiMe3] is stable towards hydrolysis, [Re2(CO)6(µ-OSiMe3)3]– is readily hydrolyzed to [Re2(CO)6(µ-OH)(µ-OSiMe3)2]–, a molecular model of silica anchored [Re2(CO)6(µ-OH)(µ-OSi≡)2]–, whose structure has been determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction. Key words: surface organometallic chemistry, rhenium, silica, silanolate, molecular model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207