MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017854965 · doi:10.2118/04-11-das

Drilling Induced Formation Damage of Horizontal Wells in Tight Gas Reservoirs

2004· article· en· W2017854965 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gökhan Coşkuner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsHusky Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringDrillingTight gasPerforationCompletion (oil and gas wells)DrillGeologyDirectional drillingBoreholeHydraulic fracturingDrill pipeDrilling fluidWellboreGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract As the oil and gas industry matures and known reserves continue to be depleted, the focus moves towards more challenging environments. To help moderate the decline trend in reserves or to reverse it, the industry is expanding its exploration and development efforts to include horizons with permeabilities in the same range as common cement, that is, microdarcies. While horizontal wells are being used with increasing frequency in exploiting tight gas reservoirs, many questions have arisen as to the optimum practices to drill such wells. The experience of drilling horizontal wells in one of the deep basin tight gas reservoirs in Alberta is presented in this article. The initial results were below expectations. Consequently, a systematic study was undertaken to investigate the controllable factors that are in play during the course of drilling these wells. It was found that formation damage played a signifi cant role in reducing the initial productivity. This was particularly true because all horizontal wells were completed in an open hole fashion where bypassing damage by perforation is usually not an option. The investigation into the formation damage in horizontal wells and its results are presented. The study led to using a new drill-in fl uid which resulted in signifi cantly reduced formation damage. Well tests conducted in the wells drilled with the new fluid appear to support the laboratory results. Finally, general guidelines are provided for selecting the most suitable drill-in fluid and implementing it in the field to minimize the horizontal well drilling formation damage in tight gas formations. Introduction As the oil and gas industry matures and known reserves continue to be depleted, the focus moves towards more challenging environments. One such environment is the Deep Basin area of West Central Alberta where vast reserves of natural gas and associated liquids are present in a number of low permeability zones(1). Similar areas also exist in the U.S., such as Powder River Basin and the Permian Basin where in situ permeabilities are in the 100 microdarcy (0.1 mD) range or less. It should be noted that while routine permeability measurement of the cores in the laboratory may indicate permeabilities up to 1 mD for such reservoirs, the effective gas permeability in the reservoir will be significantly less(2). Horizontal wells are being used with increasing frequency in exploiting such reservoirs in an attempt to increase production rates by maximizing reservoir exposure, targeting multiple zones, reducing drawdowns and increasing the potential to intersect zones of enhanced permeability, such as natural fractures(3–9). However, the production results from many horizontal wells have been below expectations(9–11). While it appears easier to attain technical success with horizontal wells, economic success has been more difficult to achieve(10). This has been partly attributed to limitations in current completion technology, reservoir heterogeneity, well geometry, and formation damage(9, 12). A further complicating factor, which affects the production rates adversely, arises when the produced gas is rich in liquids(13).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologySame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207