Bimodal agonism in heteromeric cyclic nucleotide-gated channels
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Direct binding of cGMP or cAMP to tetrameric cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) channels will normally promote the open (conductive) conformation. However, the catfish CNGA2 subtype exhibits bimodal agonism, whereby open probability (P(o)) increases with initial cGMP binding events ("pro" action) but decreases with subsequent cGMP binding events ("con" action) that occur at concentrations above 3 mM. We constructed, and heterologously expressed, chimeric CNG channel subunits with sequence substitutions in the binding domain (BD), and tested their activation using patch-clamp of cell-free membranes. A normal subunit with the rat CNGA4 BD (with only pro action) could be converted into a bimodal subunit (both pro and con action) by replacing the N-terminal portion of the BD with catfish CNGA2 sequence. We then fused two bimodal and two normal subunits in tandem tetramers, to form heteromeric CNG channels with bimodal pseudosubunits either adjacent (cis) or diagonally opposite (trans). The cis tetramer showed con action, with a mean ratio of steady-state conductances g((30 mM cGMP))/g((3 mM cGMP)) = 0.87, demonstrating bimodal agonism in a heteromeric CNG channel for the first time. In contrast, trans tetramers showed normal cGMP agonism up to 30 mM cGMP with mean g((30 mM cGMP))/g((3mM cGMP))= 1.02, although a minority of oocytes (4 of 15) expressed anomalous channel populations with con action. Rearranging subunits in a heteromer thus influences a channel's P(o) at high cGMP concentration. The sensitivity of con action to neighbouring subunits implies a cooperative mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it