Associations between lower limb impairments, locomotor capacities and kinematic variables in the frontal plane during walking in adults with chronic stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to examine the associations between impairments of the paretic limb, locomotor capacities and kinematic variables in the frontal plane during walking. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: Ten community-dwelling individuals with chronic hemiparesis due to a cerebrovascular accident. METHODS: Frontal plane kinematics of the shoulders and pelvis were assessed during treadmill walking in a gait lab using a videographic system to obtain the lateral displacements and lateral accelerations. The percentages of time spent in single stance were determined with foot-switches. Index of asymmetry for the lateral accelerations and single stance were also calculated. Subject motor and functional characteristics were measured by standardised clinical tests. RESULTS: Correlation analyses with Pearson product-moment correlation or Spearman's rank correlation revealed that, except for spasticity, the clinical scores were moderately to strongly associated with frontal kinematics and the single stance. In the multiple step-wise regression analysis, only the pelvic lateral displacements and the index of asymmetry in single stance were explained at more than 70% by the clinical scores with the Time Up and Go test explaining a high proportion of the total variance of these frontal parameters. CONCLUSION: Findings demonstrated associations between physical impairments, locomotor capacities and the frontal kinematics in adults with chronic stroke.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".