MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2017963523 · doi:10.1097/iop.0b013e3182a74f21

Eyelid Margin Basal Cell Carcinoma Managed With Full-Thickness En-Face Frozen Section Histopathology

2014· article· en· W2017963523 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsOntario Council of University Libraries
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHistopathologyBasal cell carcinomaEyelidFrozen section procedureSurgeryBasal cellPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To determine the tumor control rate of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) of the eyelid margin managed by full-thickness eyelid resection with en-face frozen section-controlled margins and primary reconstruction of the defect. METHODS: This is a retrospective, consecutive, noncomparative, longitudinal interventional case series from a single institution. A review of medical records of all patients with BCC involving the eyelid margin treated by full-thickness en-face frozen section histopathology between June 1997 and June 2011 was conducted. All cases were managed with gross full-thickness resection of the eyelid margin tumor with subsequent reconstruction. Intraoperative frozen section histopathology was performed on additional 1-mm thick medial, lateral, and inferior/superior specimens in a full-thickness en-face fashion. The main outcome measure was rate of recurrence over the follow-up period. Additional data collected included patient demographics, lesion site and size, histopathology, reconstructive technique, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The review resulted in a total of 74 patients with 77 lesions. Of these, 45 lesions had a minimum 5-year follow up. Those cases that involved the lacrimal system were excluded resulting in a total of 43 cases for analysis, which had a mean follow up of 6.4 years (range, 5.0-13.0). Three cases (6.9%) represented a recurrent BCC, while all other cases were primary BCCs. The histopathological subtypes included nodular (65.1%), infiltrative (18.6%), and superficial (16.3%). There were no cases of recurrence (100% cure rate) over the follow-up period. Most defects (88.4%) were reconstructed by direct closure or a temporal rotation flap. The only complication noted was the development of a hypertrophic scar in 1 patient that resolved with conservative management. In the total series of 77 lesions, the mean follow-up period was 4.5 years (range, 0.5-13.0). One recurrence (1.3%) was detected after 1.1 years for an infiltrative BCC measuring 10.0 mm in diameter that involved the lacrimal system. CONCLUSIONS: Eyelid margin BCC can be managed effectively with full-thickness en-face frozen section-controlled excision and primary reconstruction of the defect. The high cure rate compares favorably with other excision techniques such as Mohs micrographic surgery, with the advantages of a single operation and excellent reconstructive result.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it