Preparation and luminescence of SrAl<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub>: Eu<sup>2+</sup>,Dy<sup>3+</sup> phosphors coated with maleic anhydride
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, maleic anhydride is directly coated on the surface of SrAl2O4: Eu2+, Dy3+ (SAO‐ED) phosphors by an interfacial coordination chemistry method. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X‐ray photoelectron spectra (XPS), X‐ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) methods are used to characterize the coating. The experimental result shows that a dense coating layer is consisting of maleic anhydride coordination with metal ions on the surface of the phosphors and the coating process does not destroy the crystal structure of the phosphors. It is also found that the introduction of maleic anhydride does not change the excitation and emission spectra of SAO‐ED phosphors, but decreases the luminous intensity, which is verified by the photoluminescence (PL) measurement. Afterglow delay curves show that the initial brightness of coated SAO‐ED phosphors decreases, but the afterglow decay rate of coated phosphors is slower than that of uncoated phosphors after they both are immersed into water for one month. This indicates that the coating layer protects the phosphors and the crystal structure of coated phosphors in water was not destroyed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".