MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018061932 · doi:10.1111/ddi.12280

Representing taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: new challenges for<scp>M</scp>editerranean marine‐protected areas

2014· article· en· W2018061932 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiversity and Distributions · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsPhylogenetic diversityPhylogenetic treeBiodiversityRange (aeronautics)EcologyOptimal distinctiveness theoryBiologySpecies diversitySpecies richnessNull modelGlobal biodiversityTaxonomic rankBeta diversityTaxon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aim To assess gaps in the representation of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity among coastal fishes in M editerranean marine‐protected areas ( MPA s). Location M editerranean S ea. Methods We first assessed gaps in the taxonomic representation of the 340 coastal fish species in M editerranean MPA s, with representation targets (the species range proportion to be covered by MPA s) set to be inversely proportional to species' range sizes. We then asked whether MPA s favoured representation of phylogenetically and functionally more distinct species or whether there was a tendency to favour less distinctive ones. We finally evaluated the overall conservation effectiveness of the MPA s using a metric that integrates species' phylogenetic and functional relationships and targets achievement. The effectiveness of the MPA system at protecting biodiversity was assessed by comparison of its achievements against a null model obtained by siting current MPA s at random over the study area. Results Among the coastal fish species analysed, 16 species were not covered by any MPA . All the remaining species only partially achieved the pre‐defined representation target. The current MPA system missed fewer species than expected from siting MPA s at random. However, c. 70% of the species did not achieve better protection in the current MPA s than expected from siting MPA s at random. Functional and evolutionary distinctiveness were weakly correlated with target achievement. The observed coverage of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity was not different or lower than expected from siting MPA s at random. Main conclusions The M editerranean MPA system falls short in meeting conservation targets for coastal fish taxonomic diversity, phylogenetic diversity and functional diversity. M editerranean MPA s do not encompass more biodiversity than expected by chance. This study reveals multiple ongoing challenges and calls for regional collaboration for the extension of the M editerranean system of MPA s to meet international commitments and reduce the ongoing loss of marine biodiversity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.005
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it