MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018087746 · doi:10.1007/s13225-014-0280-y

Phylogeny and taxonomic revision of Thelonectria discophora (Ascomycota, Hypocreales, Nectriaceae) species complex

2014· article· en· W2018087746 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFungal Diversity · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersUniversidad de Costa RicaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsHypocrealesBiologyMonophylySpecies complexChlamydosporeTaxonomy (biology)BotanyPhylogenetic treePhylogeneticsPhyloCodeConidiumCladisticsAscomycotaZoologyEvolutionary biologyClade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Specimens regarded as Thelonectria discophora ( Thelonectria , Nectriaceae , Hypocreales ) constitute a conspicuous group of saprobic fungi on decaying plant material, characterized by red perithecia each with a broad mammiform (nipple-like) apex. The asexual state is characterized by a cylindrocarpon-like morphology, with 3–5 septate macroconidia, unicellular microconidia and chlamydospores that are rarely produced in culture. In the past, T. discophora was regarded as one species with a wide geographic distribution. However, a recent study rejected the monophyly and cosmopolitan distribution of this species , and showed the existence of at least 16 cryptic species distributed in three main groups. By combining the results of phylogenetic analyses of six nuclear loci and morphological studies, we revised the taxonomy of the T. discophora species complex, resulting in the description of 12 new species and four new combinations based on historic names. Even though molecular phylogenetic analyses strongly support the segregation of these species, and are in agreement with previous studies, individual diagnostic morphological characters for each species could not be identified. However, discrete morphological traits corresponding to each of the three main groups of species were discovered. Lineages could be differentiated based on the average values of morphological traits as well as the presence/absence of characteristic asexual propagules and colony growth at 30C. Descriptions, illustrations are provided for the recognized species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it