MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018134715 · doi:10.1002/dvdy.10175

Distinctive gene profiles occur at key points during natural metamorphosis in the <i>Xenopus laevis</i> tadpole tail

2002· article· en· W2018134715 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Dynamics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAgence Nationale pour la Gestion des Déchets Radioactifs
KeywordsTadpole (physics)XenopusBiologyMetamorphosisSalientiaCell biologyKey (lock)GeneAnatomyLarvaZoologyGeneticsEcologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thyroid hormones (THs) are essential for tadpole metamorphosis into a juvenile frog; however, a complex interplay between additional hormones and signaling events also contributes to this dramatic developmental phase. A major mechanism of TH action is the nuclear receptor-mediated regulation of gene transcription of responsive genes. By using the precocious metamorphic model, several genes have been identified as TH responsive in the regressing tail. Many of these genes also exhibit altered expression during natural metamorphosis. Although identification of these genes provides insight into the mechanism whereby TH acts, complex interplay between TH and other hormones and the developmental stage-dependency of tissue responses contribute to the timing and coordination of metamorphic events. We investigated the temporal gene expression profile in Xenopus laevis tadpole tails from premetamorphosis through metamorphic climax by using a combination of a novel frog cDNA array containing 420 genes and quantitative real-time PCR. Seventy-nine genes were identified whose steady-state mRNA expression levels were altered in the tadpole tail during natural metamorphosis, of which 34 have previously been identified to be TH responsive in frogs or mammals. Of these genes, 75 clustered into 13 groups that displayed distinct developmental expression profiles. The levels of 28 transcripts were altered during premetamorphosis, 31 during prometamorphosis, and 43 with the onset of tail regression. This work establishes an important baseline for determining the mechanisms whereby tissues undergo differing metamorphic fates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.797
Threshold uncertainty score0.944

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it