MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2018156569 · doi:10.1186/1710-1492-10-s1-a57

Pre-existing human rhinovirus infection modulates host response to secondary bacterial infections

2014· article· en· W2018156569 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jason Arnason, Kyla C. Jamieson, Cora Kooi, Sergei Nikitenko, Sami Shariff, Chris Shelfoon, David Proud, Richard Leigh

Bibliographic record

VenueAllergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhinovirusHost (biology)Host responseMicrobiologyHost factorsVirologyBiologyImmunologyImmune systemVirusEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Secondary bacterial infections following viral infections of the airways are well documented and are associated with increased severity of respiratory disease compared to virus or bacterial infections alone. Human rhinovirus (HRV) infections are the most common causes of exacerbations in individuals with chronic airways diseases such as asthma and COPD. Moreover, bacterial colonization is commonly found in the airways of patients experiencing exacerbations of these chronic airways diseases and linked to increased severity and duration of these exacerbations. The mechanisms underlying the increased prevalence of secondary bacterial infections and the association with more severe outcomes following viral infections is not known. It has been suggested that viral infection of the airways cause dysregulation of innate host defense mechanisms, such as, impaired antimicrobial peptide expression of the airways. Antimicrobial peptides are key components of the innate immune response after infection and are important in efficient clearance of microbial colonization to prevent infection. We sought to determine whether HRV modulates the innate host defense response to secondary bacterial infections of the airways. Studies performed using primary human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs). Cells grown in monolayer to confluence (80-90%). Antibiotics and Hydrocortisone were removed from the media 48 h and 24 h prior to infection respectively. On day of infection, cells were stimulated with purified HRV-16 or bacteria ( H. influenzae/P. aeruginosa ) alone, or treated in combination of HRV-16 then subsequently bacteria. TLR5 agonists (Flagella) also used alone and in combination with HRV-16. The protein and mRNA levels of different antimicrobial peptides (β-defensin, LL-37, lysozyme, lactoferrin, and SLPI) measured using ELISA (R&D Systems) and real-time RT-PCR (Applied Biosystems), respectively. Preliminary data indicate supernatants from HRV-16/bacterial co-infection resulted in synergistic trend in β-defensin levels compared to HRV and bacteria alone. A synergistic increase in β-defensin levels was also seen with TLR5 agonist when combined post HRV-16 infection compared to TLR5 or HRV-16 alone. Minimum inhibitory concentration results showed β-defensin (1mg/ml), Lysozyme (30µg/ml), Lactoferrin (1mg/ml) and LL-37 (460µg/ml) were able to inhibit growth of NTHi and PAO. The data provide the first demonstration that there is a dysregulation of antimicrobial levels in HRV infected HBECs when encountered with a secondary bacterial infection. This provides evidence to why individuals with chronic airways diseases have a prolonged and more severe disease state than normal individuals. It could also lead to a new targeted therapy of people with diseases such as asthma or COPD to decrease severity of exacerbations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAllergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology→Same topicRespiratory viral infections research→French-language works237,207→