Reconstruction of electron spectra using singular component decomposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reconstruction of electron spectra of medical accelerators from measured depth dose distributions is an attractive tool for commissioning of a Monte Carlo treatment planning system. However, the reconstruction method is an inverse radiation transport problem which is poorly conditioned, in the sense it may become unstable due to small perturbations in the input data. Predicting the sharp (delta-like) peak in the electron spectrum provides an additional challenge for the numerical reconstruction technique. To improve efficiency and robustness of the reconstruction technique, we developed an algorithm based on a separation of the electron spectrum into singular and regular components. We approximate the singular peak of the spectrum by a narrow weighted Gaussian function. The parameters of this Gaussian function are sought using only the fall-off and toe regions of the depth-dose curve. Analytical representation of the spectral peak by a Gaussian has benefit since only one weight and the mean and variance must be derived from the depth-dose curve instead of multiple spectra weights. The regular part of the spectrum is reconstructed from the residual depth-dose distribution using a variational method combined with a regularization technique to avoid the nonphysical oscillations. The effectiveness of the method is demonstrated by comparing predictions to "benchmark" spectra and depth-dose distributions from Monte Carlo simulation of medical accelerators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".