Enhancement of hippocampal cholinergic neurotransmission through 5-HT<sub>1A</sub>receptor-mediated pathways by repeated lithium treatment in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hippocampal cholinergic neuronal activity is reported to be regulated, at least partly, through serotonin1A (5-HT1A) receptors. Chronic lithium treatment has been shown to alter both behavioral and neurochemical responses mediated by postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors. We investigated whether long-term lithium treatment affects central cholinergic neurotransmission through 5-HT1A receptor-mediated pathways. Changes in acetylcholine (ACh) release induced by 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), a 5-HT1A receptor agonist, in the rat hippocampus were measured using a microdialysis technique and a radioimmunoassay for ACh. Administration of lithium for 21 days resulted in a serum lithium concentration of 1.03 mM and caused little change in density or affinity of [3H]8-OH-DPAT binding sites in the hippocampus. The local application of 8-OH-DPAT into the hippocampus of lithium treated rats increased the ACh efflux in both the absence and the presence of physostigmine, a cholinesterase (ChE) inhibitor, in the perfusion fluid. The basal ACh efflux of lithium treated rats was not different from that of the control rats under normal conditions, but was significantly higher than that of the controls when ChE was inhibited. These results demonstrate that chronic lithium treatment increases spontaneous ACh release in the hippocampus under conditions of ChE inhibition, but not under normal conditions, and enhances cholinergic neurotransmission through 5-HT1A receptor-mediated pathways, and suggest that activation of 5-HT1A receptor function by lithium is related to the enhancement of hippocampal cholinergic neurotransmission.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".