Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents a Bayesian kernel-based clustering method. The associated model arises as an embedding of the Potts density for class membership probabilities into an extended Bayesian model for joint data and class membership probabilities. The method may be seen as a principled extension of the super-paramagnetic clustering. The model depends on two parameters: the temperature and the kernel bandwidth. The clustering is obtained from the posterior marginal adjacency membership probabilities and does not depend on any particular value of the parameters. We elicit an informative prior based on random graph theory and kernel density estimation. A stochastic population Monte Carlo algorithm, based on parallel runs of the Wang–Landau algorithm, is developed to estimate the posterior adjacency membership probabilities and the parameter posterior. The convergence of the algorithm is also established. The method is applied to the whole human proteome to uncover human genes that share common evolutionary history. Our experiments and application show that good clustering results are obtained at many different values of the temperature and bandwidth parameters. Hence, instead of focusing on finding adequate values of the parameters, we advocate making clustering inference based on the study of the distribution of the posterior adjacency membership probabilities. This article has online supplementary material.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it