Elastin Binding Protein and FKBP65 Modulate <i>in Vitro</i> Self-Assembly of Human Tropoelastin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Elastin is a protein that provides the unusual properties of extensibility and elastic recoil to tissues. Assembly of polymeric elastin into its final architecture in the extracellular matrix involves both self-aggregation properties of its monomeric precursor, tropoelastin, and interactions with several matrix-associated proteins that appear to act by modulating the intrinsic self-assembly of tropoelastin. Because of its highly nonpolar character and propensity to self-aggregate, it has been suggested that mechanisms limiting self-aggregation must also be present during the transit of tropoelastin through the cell prior to secretion. Both the elastin binding protein (EBP) and FKBP65 have been suggested to fulfill that role in the Golgi and endoplasmic reticulum compartments of the cell, respectively. However, details about the nature of the interactions between these proteins as well as about the mechanism by which they may act to limit self-aggregation are lacking. In this study, we demonstrate that both EBP and FKBP65 have strong binding affinities for tropoelastin, with the dissociation constant of EBP approximately 4-fold lower than that of FKBP65. Both proteins also modify the kinetics of self-assembly of tropoelastin in an in vitro system, consistent with a role in attenuating the premature intracellular self-aggregation of tropoelastin through a mechanism that limits the growth and maturation of aggregates. The ability of FKBP65 to modulate the self-assembly of tropoelastin is independent of its enzymatic activity to promote the cis-trans isomerization of proline residues in proteins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".