MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018305769 · doi:10.1093/ps/79.7.956

Effect of Dietary Lipase Enzyme on Gut Morphology, Gastric Motility, and Long-Term Performance of Broiler Chicks

2000· article· en· W2018305769 on OpenAlexaff
Waleed Al‐Marzooqi, S. Leeson

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLipaseBroilerEnzymeDigestive enzymeBiologyStarterWeight gainEnzyme assayInternal medicineAnimal scienceMotilityStomachEndocrinologyFood scienceBody weightBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three experiments were conducted to test a previously described anorexic effect of graded dietary supplements of Pancreatic lipase enzyme on gut structure, gastric motility, and long-term performance of broiler chicks. In Experiment 1, dietary Pancreatic enzyme was used at graded levels of 0, 0.214, 0.429, 0.643, 0.857, and 1.071% to test the effect of this enzyme on gut structure, whereas Experiment 2 was designed to test its effect at 0, 0.268, 0.536, 0.804, 1.071, and 1.339% on gastric motility. The histological examination of the small intestine and a cineradiographic study of birds fed diets supplemented with lipase enzyme failed to detect any difference in gut structure, and there was no apparent adverse effect on gastric motility. Experiment 3 was conducted to test the effect of graded supplements of Pancreatic enzyme on performance of 300 male broiler chicks raised for 6 wk to determine whether the enzyme had any long-term effect on performance characteristics, especially feed intake. Only starter diets (0 to 21 d) were supplemented with 0, 0.375, 0.750, or 1.125% enzyme, and each diet was represented by three replicate pens of 25 male chicks each. Subsequent diets did not contain any enzyme. During the first 3 wk, increased dietary concentration of lipase enzyme caused a linear reduction of feed intake and body weight gain (P < 0.01). At 21 d the percentage weight of the liver was significantly greater with 1.125% enzyme (P < 0.01). However, added enzyme had no effect on 21 to 42 d or 1 to 42 d growth or feed intake (P > 0.05) or on the size of any internal organs examined at 42 d. Pancreatic enzyme has previously been shown to improve fat digestion and increase diet AMEn for young chicks fed animal-vegetable blended fats. These positive effects, however, are associated with marked anorexia, and from the present study, it seems that this effect was not related to physical changes in gut histology or in prolonged digesta transit time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.639
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoultry ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207