MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018313407 · doi:10.1080/01140671.2002.9514197

Genetic diversity in New Zealand populations of <i>Sclerotium cepivorum</i>

2002· article· en· W2018313407 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
J.L. Tyson, Hayley J. Ridgway, R.A. Fullerton, A. Stewart

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsSclerotiumBiologyRAPDGenetic diversityMyceliumPrimer (cosmetics)BotanyVeterinary medicineBiotechnologyDemographyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mycelial interactions were examined between 231 New Zealand isolates of Sclerotium cepivorum Berk., as well as 25 isolates from a further eight countries. Within the group of New Zealand isolates six mycelial compatibility groups (MCGs) were identified and named using reference strains obtained from the University of Guelph, Canada. Two new groups, presently only known from New Zealand, were identified. Heterogeneity was found both within and between fields in all regions. A subset of 51 S. cepivorum isolates was further investigated for genetic diversity using universally primed PCR (UP‐PCR) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analyses. When results were analysed separately, each primer distinguished one to three genetic groups. However, when the results from two primers (L15 and OPAX15) were combined, six genetic groups were revealed. The results, as shown by MCGs and molecular methods, demonstrate the presence of genetic diversity in New Zealand field populations of S. cepivorum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural ScienceSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207