MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018380906 · doi:10.1093/jac/dki118

Genetic analysis of pbp2x in clinical Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates in Quebec, Canada

2005· article· en· W2018380906 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dominic Granger, Geneviève Boily-Larouche, Pierre Turgeon, Karl Weiss, Michel Roger

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPenicillinStreptococcus pneumoniaePenicillin binding proteinsMicrobiologyBiologyAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the nature of the amino acid motifs found in penicillin-binding protein (PBP) 2x of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates across the province of Quebec (Canada), and to obtain preliminary information regarding the prevalence of these alterations. METHODS: The pbp2x genomic region encompassing codons 178-703, which includes the entire region of the transpeptidase domain, was sequenced and compared for 52 clinical isolates comprising 20 penicillin-susceptible (PSSP), 20 penicillin-intermediate (PISP) and 12 penicillin-resistant (PRSP) pneumococci. RESULTS: The degree of diversity within PBP2x correlated with increased resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics. There were an average of 5.0 +/- 1.8 mutations in PSSP, 37.9 +/- 4.4 in PISP, and 63.0 +/- 2.0 in PRSP isolates when compared with the control penicillin-susceptible strain R6. At least six distinct amino acid profiles were identified among PISP strains isolated in Quebec. In contrast, all PRSP isolates shared a similar pattern of altered amino acids compared with the sequence from susceptible strains. CONCLUSIONS: These data will be useful in future studies to monitor the genetic changes associated with the emergence and spread of beta-lactam resistance in Quebec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.152

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapySame topicPneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsFrench-language works237,207