Multiple Auditory Steady State Responses (80-101 Hz): Effects of Ear, Gender, Handedness, Intensity and Modulation Rate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief Objective: To evaluate how the amplitudes and latencies of auditory steady state responses (ASSRs) to multiple stimuli presented at rates between 80 and 101 Hz vary with the ear of stimulation, the handedness or gender of a subject, and the rate and intensity of the stimuli. Design: ASSRs were recorded in a group of 56 young adults (27 females, 13 left handed) using several stimulus conditions. In the two main conditions, four sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones (each uniquely modulated using rates between 80 and 105 Hz) with carrier frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, were presented concurrently to each ear (eight total). In the first condition the modulation rates for the left ear were slower than those for the right and in the second condition this relationship was reversed. Other conditions evaluated the responses to single stimuli, to multiple stimuli presented in one ear only and to multiple stimuli presented dichotically (four in each ear) with rates that decreased rather than increased with increasing carrier frequency. Stimuli were presented at an intensity of 73 dB SPL except in two conditions wherein the intensity was 53 dB SPL. Results: At 73 dB SPL, multiple-stimulus ASSRs were significantly reduced (monotic or dichotic) compared with single-stimulus ASSRs, especially at 1000 and 2000 Hz. There were significant differences between monotic and dichotic stimulation. When the stimuli were presented dichotically, the amplitude of the response varied with the relative rates of modulation for the stimuli presented in each ear. ASSRs were larger in the ear with the higher rate when the carrier frequencies were 500 and 1000 Hz and when the modulation rates were <90 Hz. There were no consistent effects of gender or ear of stimulation. There were also no significant effects of handedness. Conclusions: Presenting multiple stimuli at 73 dB SPL in the same ear decreases the amplitude of the ASSR compared with when the stimuli are presented singly. This is caused by the masking effect of low on higher carrier frequencies and some other inhibitory effect of high on lower frequencies. Dichotic stimulation can increase the amplitude of the response to stimuli modulated more rapidly (and concomitantly decrease the responses to the stimuli modulated more slowly). This effect occurs only for carrier frequencies <2000 Hz and for modulation frequencies <90 Hz. Dichotic stimulation also causes a small but highly significant decrease in the latency of the response compared with monotic stimulation. Auditory steady-state responses to multiple stimuli presented simultaneously are affected by the intensity frequency and rate of the stimuli. At 73 dB SPL, multiple stimuli presented simultaneously evoke smaller responses than when the stimuli are presented singly, particularly for carrier frequencies 1000 and 2000 Hz. Dichotically presented stimuli evoke responses 0.3 msec earlier than monotically presented stimuli. When stimuli with the same carrier frequency but different modulation rates are presented to the two ears, the stimulus with the faster modulation rate will evoke a larger response, provided the carrier frequency is less than 2000 Hz and the modulation rate less than 90 Hz. Gender, handedness and ear of stimulation do not consistently alter the responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".