Minimax Design of IIR Digital Filters Using SDP Relaxation Technique
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a new algorithm using semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxation to design infinite impulse response digital filters in the minimax sense. Unlike traditional design algorithms that try to directly minimize the error limit, the proposed algorithm employs a bisection searching procedure to locate the minimum error limit of the approximation error. Given a fixed error limit at each iteration, the SDP relaxation technique is adopted to formulate the design problem in a convex form. In practice, the true minimax design cannot be always obtained. Thus, a regularized feasibility problem is adopted in the bisection searching procedure. The stability of the designed filters can also be guaranteed by adjusting the regularization coefficient. Unlike other sequential design methods, the proposed algorithm tries to find a feasible solution at each iteration of the sequential design procedure within a feasible set defined by the relaxed constraints. This feasible set is not restricted within the neighborhood of a given point obtained from the previous iteration. Thus, the proposed method can avoid being trapped in the locally minimum point. Four examples are presented in this paper to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it