MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The diffusion of alternative health care: a Canadian case study of chiropractic and naturopathic practices

2000· article· en· W2018528956 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Allison Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNaturopathyChiropracticHealth carePolitical scienceMedicineAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the dominance of the biomedical model in North America, other types of health care, such as the various forms of alternative health practices, are viewed as ancillary. Alternative health care practices, such as chiropractic and naturopathy are a growing phenomenon which are becoming increasingly available and accessible throughout North America, due to their expanding acceptance and use. The spatial growth of chiropractic and naturopathic practitioners in two Canadian provinces is described for the period between 1984 and 1993. This spatial description, framed within Brown's innovation diffusion model, provides insight into the geographical dimensions of these growing phenomena. In addition to exhibiting contagious diffusion, both practitioner groups exhibit the same hierarchical pattern that has been found with alternative health care practitioners in the United States. The many supply and demand factors influencing the diffusion of these two alternative health care practices are discussed in light of the forms of diffusion found. As alternative health care is under‐researched by geographers, this research is a preliminary contribution, providing an initial spatial understanding of its growing presence. La prépondérance du modéle biomédical américain maintient le statut ancillaire des formes de soins de santé alternatives. Les pratiques de soins de santé alternatives, telles que la chiropractie et la naturopathie, sont des phénoménes de plus en plus répandus et dont la disponibilité et l'accessibilité augmentent en Amérique du Nord en raison du niveau croissant de leur acceptation et utilisation par le public. Il sera question ici de l'expansion géographique des praticiens en chiropractie et en naturopathie dans deux provinces canadiennes entre 1984 et 1993. Cette analyse géographique, qui s'appuie sur le modele de diffusion des innovations de Brown, explique les dimensions géographiques de ces phénoménes en pleine croissance. En plus de présenter une diffusion de type contagieuse, les deux groupes de praticiens présentent la même forme hiérarchique de diffusion que celle observée aux États‐Unis. Les nombreux facteurs d'offre et de demande qui affectent la diffusion de ces deux pratiques de soins de santé alternatives sont examinés. Puisque l'étude des soins de santé alternatifs est encore limitée en géographie, cette recherche jette les premiers jalons d'une meilleure compréhension géographie de ce phénoméne en croissance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennesSame topicComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesFrench-language works237,207