MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018536677 · doi:10.2135/cropsci2012.07.0436

Growth and Physiological Response of Timothy to Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Temperature under Contrasted Nitrogen Fertilization

2013· article· en· W2018536677 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ângela Piva, Annick Bertrand, Gilles Bélanger, Yves Castonguay, Philippe Séguin

Bibliographic record

VenueCrop Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant responses to elevated CO2
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotosynthesisCarbon dioxideBiomass (ecology)ForageHuman fertilizationBiologySugarAgronomyAnimal scienceNitrogenBotanyChemistryEcologyFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Climate change is expected to affect the growth and metabolism of many economically important plants including timothy ( Phleum pratense L.), a major forage grass species in eastern Canada and northern Europe. Our objective was to assess the impacts of predicted increases in CO 2 concentration and temperature, under contrasted N fertilization, on timothy biomass, leaf photosynthesis, and nonstructural carbohydrate concentration. Plants were grown in growth chambers under either 400 or 600 μL L −1 of CO 2 and at a day/night temperature of either 22/10°C or 25/15°C, and they were fertilized with 0, 60, or 120 kg N ha −1 . Two sequential harvests were taken following a 6‐wk establishment period. Elevated CO 2 concentration did not affect forage biomass and increased root biomass only at first harvest, but it increased leaf photosynthesis and total soluble sugar concentration mostly when N was not limiting (120 kg N ha −1 ). Increased temperature reduced forage and total biomass and soluble sugar concentrations at the second harvest under 120 kg N ha −1 . Combined increases of temperature and CO 2 concentration (600 μL L −1 and 25/15°C) had no effect on biomass yield, but it increased leaf photosynthesis and nonstructural carbohydrates concentration compared to current conditions. Our findings show that predicted future conditions of elevated temperature and CO 2 concentration will have little effect on the yield of timothy while their effect on photosynthesis and forage nonstructural concentration will depend on N availability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.192

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrop ScienceSame topicPlant responses to elevated CO2French-language works237,207