Marine wind analysis from remotely sensed measurements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A primary objective of this study is to demonstrate a methodology that can potentially be used to generate high spatial resolution gridded vector wind fields for the northwest Atlantic on synoptic time scales. This task is accomplished using optimal interpolation (OI) to blend satellite wind data from European remote sensing (ERS-2) satellite scatterometers, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) scatterometers (NSCAT), and TOPEX/Poseidon and ERS-2 altimeters with numerical weather prediction (NWP) model wind estimates. The NWP model wind fields are produced using the MC2 atmospheric model (Canadian mesoscale compressible community atmospheric model). The grid for these fields is 0.25°. OI correlation functions and variances are derived from remotely sensed data. A second objective of the study is to provide a methodology for validation of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) derived vector winds from RADARSAT-1 images collected during the 1997 Labrador Sea Deep Convection Experiment (LSDCE). These winds are derived from the observed radar cross section and a scatterometer wind retrieval model. The validation of the SAR-derived winds is based on the OI winds and in situ ship-based winds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".