MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018552370 · doi:10.1255/ejms.1164

The Dissociation Chemistry of Ionized Methyl Carbamate and its Isomers Revisited: Theory and Experiment in Concert

2012· article· en· W2018552370 on OpenAlexaff
Peter C. Burgers, Graham A. McGibbon, Karl J. Jobst

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Mass Spectrometry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersHousing and Building National Research Center
KeywordsChemistryDissociation (chemistry)IsotopologueDecarbonylationIonBond-dissociation energyIonizationMedicinal chemistryComputational chemistryPhotochemistryCatalysisPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early combined computational and experimental studies by J.K. Terlouw c.s. in Refs. 1-3 propose that low-energy methyl carbamate ions, NH(2)COOCH(3)(•+) (MC-1), rearrange into distonic ions NH(2)C(OH)OCH(2)(•+) and hydrogen-bridged radical cations [NH(2)C=O--H--OCH(2)](•+) (MC-5) en route to the observed losses of HCO(•) and CO. In this study, we report on the generation of ions MC-5 by decarbonylation of ionized methyl oxamate NH(2)COCOOCH(3)(•+). Theory and experiment agree that ion MC-5 is a key intermediate in the dissociation of low-energy ions MC-1. The subsequent HCO(•) loss, however, may not proceed via the route proposed in Ref. 2, but rather by an entirely different mechanism involving proton-transport catalysis (PTC) in ion MC-5. This view is further supported by the dissociation behaviour of the MC-5 isotopologue [ND(2)C=O--D--OCH(2)](•+), which is conveniently generated from the d(3)-labelled glycolamide ion DOCH(2)C(=O)ND(2)(•+).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Mass SpectrometrySame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207