Preparation and sorption studies of microsphere copolymers containing β‐cyclodextrin and poly(acrylic acid)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Microsphere polymeric materials containing β‐cyclodextrin (β‐CD) and poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) with tunable morphologies were prepared in order to improve their sorption characteristics in aqueous solution. The microsphere polymeric materials were prepared using a (water/oil) micro‐emulsion‐evaporation technique to condense β‐cyclodextrin (β‐CD) with PAA at various comonomer ratios and mixing speeds. The β‐CD microsphere copolymers were characterized using FTIR, TGA, DSC, SEM, elemental (C and H) microanalyses, and solid state 13 C‐NMR spectroscopy. The sorption properties of the polymeric materials at 295 K in aqueous solution containing p ‐nitrophenol (PNP) were studied using a dye‐based method with UV–Vis spectrophotometry at pH 4.6 and 10.3. The sorption isotherms of copolymer/PNP systems were evaluated with various isotherm models (e.g., Langmuir, BET, Freundlich, and Sips). The Sips isotherm showed the best overall agreement with the experimental results and the sorption parameters provided estimates of the sorbent surface area (12.0–331 m 2 /g) and the sorption capacity ( Q m = 0.359–2.20 mmol/g at pH = 4.6; Q m = 0.070–0.191 mmol/g at pH = 10.3) for the microsphere copolymer/PNP systems in aqueous solution. The nitrogen adsorption properties of the microporous copolymers in the solid state were obtained at 77K with BET surface areas ranging from 0.275 to 4.47 m 2 /g. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".