Evidence for Alternative Splicing of a Dopamine D2 Receptor in a Teleost
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous attempts at identifying an alternatively spliced dopamine (DA) D2 receptor in teleosts have proven unsuccessful. We provide evidence of a splicing event of a goldfish D2 (gfD2b1) receptor in the neuroendocrine brain of adult goldfish that produces a spliced short isoform (gfD2b1S). We also identify an additional novel D2b paralog (gfD2b2) that does not appear to be alternatively spliced in adult fish during the reproductive cycle. Relatively high mRNA levels of gfD2b1S were observed in the neuroendocrine brain and pituitary of sexually immature fish compared with sexually regressing fish. Real-time RT-PCR revealed that intraperitoneal injection of either SCH 23390 or sulpiride-D1- or D2-specific antagonists, respectively-decreased mRNA levels of gfD2b1S by 3.9-fold without affecting the unspliced isoforms. We suggest that the expression of the spliced D2 receptor modulates the inhibitory tone of DA throughout the reproductive cycle. The deduced amino acid sequence of gfD2b1S lacks 29 amino acids in the same region as the short isoform of mammalian D2. We propose that the gfD2b1S splice variant is the teleost ortholog of mammalian D2S. The hypothesis that D2 receptor splicing is a relatively recent innovation in higher tetrapods is not supported by our results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".