MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018653047 · doi:10.1063/1.1781164

Two-dimensional radio-frequency sheath dynamics over a nonflat electrode with perpendicular magnetic field

2004· article· en· W2018653047 on OpenAlexaff
Lu-Jing Hou, You‐Nian Wang, Z. L. Mišković

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Plasmas · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDust and Plasma Wave Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMagnetic fieldElectrodePlasmaPoisson's equationDebye sheathAtomic physicsMagnetic pressureAzimuthPerpendicularFlow velocityIonMechanicsFlow (mathematics)MagnetizationOpticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A self-consistent fluid model is developed to simulate the radio-frequency (rf) plasma sheath dynamics over a nonflat electrode, with a magnetic field applied perpendicular to it. The model consists of the two-dimensional (2D) time-dependent fluid equations, coupled with the Poisson equation, and it uses an equivalent-circuit model to self-consistently determine the relationship between the instantaneous voltage at the rf-biased electrode and the sheath thickness. In addition to the usual plasma molding effects, different properties of the azimuthal ion flow associated with the E×B drift are observed and studied under varying discharge pressures and the magnetic field intensities. It is found that the azimuthal flow exhibits rather nonuniform distribution with a peak around the edge of a hole in the electrode. In addition, when the discharge pressure increases, the velocity of the azimuthal ion flow, as well as the velocities of ion flow in all other directions, are found to decrease, whereas the sheath edge is found to move closer to the electrode. While the variation of the magnetic field is found to have no significant effect on the sheath structure, the azimuthal ion flow velocity is found to increase in proportion to the magnetic field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of PlasmasSame topicDust and Plasma Wave PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207