The Challenging Diagnosis of Cronkhite-Canada Syndrome in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cronkhite-Canada syndrome is a rare protein-losing enteropathy, classically characterized by ectodermal changes and gastrointestinal polyposis. The etiology remains obscure but immune dysregulation may be important. The diagnosis of Cronkhite-Canada syndrome in the upper gastrointestinal tract is challenging, frequently resulting in delayed patient management. In this study, we described the initial clinical presentations, upper gastrointestinal endoscopic appearances, clinical follow-up, and histologic diagnoses in 7 patients who were subsequently diagnosed with Cronkhite-Canada syndrome. Histology slides were reviewed, and IgG4 immunohistochemical analysis was performed. The most common initial endoscopic impressions were antral malignancy and gastric infection, but gastroduodenal polyposis was not described. On histologic review, the main findings in the gastric mucosa were a prominent mucosal edema, a mixed inflammatory infiltrate rich in eosinophils, and architectural changes with gland dilatation and withering. In the duodenal mucosa, total or subtotal duodenal villous atrophy, inflammation, crypt distortion, and increased apoptotic bodies were the most common features. Three patients died of the disease, and 4 patients were asymptomatic at a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. No intestinal malignancy had been diagnosed. In 2 patients foci of dysplasia in colonic polyps were identified. In only 1 patient, a significant increase in IgG4-positive plasma cells was observed in a colonic polyp. In summary, we found that patients with Cronkhite-Canada syndrome have histologic features commonly found in other immune disorders of the gastrointestinal tract that may help in establishing the diagnosis and further supports the hypothesis that Cronkhite-Canada syndrome may represent an immune dysregulation syndrome, different from IgG4-related disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".