Sex and Estrous Cycle Variations of Rat Striatal Dopamine Uptake Sites
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reuptake of dopamine into nerve terminals is the primary mechanism of inactivation of this neurotransmitter in the synaptic cleft. We report sex differences and estrous cycle variations of rat striatal dopamine uptake sites. During the estrous cycle, peak density of striatal dopamine uptake sites labelled with [3H]GBR-12935 occurred in the morning of proestrus in coincidence with peak dopamine, serotonin, dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and 5-hydroxytryptophan levels pointing to a presynaptic effect of gonadal hormones. Striatal homovanillic acid and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels as well as [3H]GBR-12935 binding affinity remained unchanged throughout the estrous cycle. The density of [3H]GBR-12935 striatal binding sites was lower in ovariectomized rats compared to intact female rats during the estrous cycle, whereas it was similar in gonadectomized male rats, intact male rats and ovariectomized rats. Binding affinity was in general similar for all the groups of rats examined. The affinity of dopamine for striatal [3H]GBR-12935 binding sites was similar in males and ovariectomized females, and did not change during the female estrous cycle. In summary, striatal dopamine uptake site density was lower in male compared to intact female rats and was shown to fluctuate during the female estrous cycle. These results suggest that gonadal hormones could influence the activity of psychoactive drugs acting on neuronal dopamine uptake sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it