MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018847726 · doi:10.1353/ajh.2015.0014

After They Closed the Gates: Jewish Illegal Immigration to the United States, 1921–1965 by Libby Garland (review)

2015· article· en· W2018847726 on OpenAlex
Ronald H. Bayor

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Jewish history · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJudaismImmigrationPsychological nativismLegislationLawImmigration lawPolitical scienceIllegal immigrationSociologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: After They Closed the Gates: Jewish Illegal Immigration to the United States, 1921–1965 by Libby Garland Ronald H. Bayor (bio) After They Closed the Gates: Jewish Illegal Immigration to the United States, 1921–1965. By Libby Garland. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014. x + 288 pp. Concerns over secure borders and illegal immigrants evoke much discussion, controversy, and passionate opinions in contemporary America. Mexican and Central American migrants stand at the center of the issue. However, Libby Garland’s focus in this well-researched and thought-provoking book is Jewish undocumented immigrants, who also induced anxiety about America’s future by entering the United States illegally during the quota law years. [End Page 197] Beginning with a fine historical rendition of the immigration laws as the federal government asserted control of migration, the author proceeds to discuss the Jewish response to the laws up to and including the discriminatory 1924 immigration quota act. Then as now, the U.S. experienced permeable borders. Jewish organizations such as HIAS, the National Council of Jewish Women, the American Jewish Committee, and others, as well as individual rabbis, found themselves in the middle of the undocumented controversy: desiring to have the immigrants come to the United States but not wanting to violate any immigration laws and bring attention to the Jewish illegals. Differences also existed among these groups about how to interpret the quota laws. Controversies over understanding the terms of the quota laws, lack of Jewish organizational coordination in opposing the legislation, and the nativism evident in the U.S. at this time forced many Jewish immigrants to create alternative entry strategies. The author provides the immigrants’ personal stories to illustrate and enliven her discussion. Earlier illegal tactics to secure entry expanded from pre-quota days and included crossing from Mexico or Canada into the U.S. or arriving from Cuba. Jewish immigrants, like many others from Europe or elsewhere, turned to bribery, smugglers, fake papers, stowing away, overstaying visitor visas and other strategies for illegal admission. When the 1921 and 1924 quotas became permanent, Jews stranded at European ports, even with visas in hand, or those still wanting to make the journey, had to find other than legal ways to enter. Along with the illegal liquor traffic during these days of Prohibition, illegal immigration became a money-making enterprise. Steamship companies travelling to Mexico, foreign government agents issuing false passports or visas, lawyers providing documents indicating an earlier legal entry and thus an authorized reentry, and the immigrant’s family offering information on tactics to evade the laws all were complicit in the undocumented trade. Forged papers furthermore allowed these immigrants to apply eventually for citizenship. These various methods derived from and encouraged illegal immigrants from other groups, especially the Chinese. Similar ploys are still evident today, including dressing and speaking in a way to indicate American identity. Jewish organizations did work diligently to change the quota laws, many aspects of which confused even those immigrating legally. These same associations tried to improve conditions for migrants in Europe and sought other locales such as Cuba for the immigrants to enter legally. Later the Jewish associations became integral players in securing the Displaced Persons Act, various refugee laws, and new immigration provisions leading up to the end of quotas with the 1965 Immigration Act. [End Page 198] Jewish and other groups representing immigrants also worked assiduously to secure the repeal of an Alien Registration Law passed in Michigan in 1931. The author covers this legislation in great detail, revealing the fervent hostility to illegal immigrants and unnaturalized Americans during this era. Then, as now, a state’s attempt to control immigration matters in lieu of the federal government represented a usurpation of federal control over immigration during a time of intense controversy over illegals and immigration policy. As Garland explains, the legislation also indicated the public’s reluctance to consider even white immigrants as part of the nation. Few Americans today remember the times when Jews constituted part of the undocumented issue. This book therefore makes a major contribution in educating contemporary Americans of various ethnic backgrounds, whose ancestors often faced a label as unassimilable and undesirable, that those now...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it