MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2018903635 · doi:10.14430/arctic550

The Ross Sea Shore Party 1914–17, by R.W. Richards

2004· article· en· W2018903635 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Peter Schledermann

Bibliographic record

VenueARCTIC · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian American and Pacific Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShoreGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The author, Richard W. Richards, was a 22-year-old Australian scientist attached to the Ross Sea Party sent to Antarctica in support of Ernest Shackleton's 1914 -17 Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition.His book, a personal journal, was first published by the Scott Polar Institute in 1962, more than 40 years after Richards and his teammates were marooned in the Antarctic for two years.The short introduction provides only a glimpse of the Antarctic expeditions preceding Shackleton's Trans-Antarctic Expedition.Even so, the reader will quickly recognize the British approach to polar exploration during the so-called Heroic Age of Antarctic Exploration: the dreadful man-hauling of heavy sledges, inadequate rations, scurvy, haphazard planning, and the reluctant use of skis and dogs.As Richards points out, the onset of scurvy was more or less constant with Scott in 1901 and 1912, with Shackleton in 1908, and with the author's own party in 1915 -16.Shackleton's plans for the Trans-Antarctic Expedition were fairly straightforward: the main party under Shackleton's leadership was to proceed to the Antarctic on the Endurance.From the shores of the Weddell Sea, Shackleton and a small party would attempt a transcontinental sled journey (man-hauling) across the South Pole to the Ross Sea.Concerned that not enough provisions could be transported that far, Shackleton had decided to send a second ship, the Aurora, with a shore party, to McMurdo Sound in the Ross Sea.The shore party was instructed to place food depots every 60 miles as far south as Mount Hope at the foot of the Beardmore Glacier, lat.83˚37' S, a distance of some 360 miles.Following the introduction, the author describes the 40year-old former sealing vessel that brought the expedition to the Ross Sea.The Aurora had been built in Dundee and was more or less a sister ship to another famous Dundee vessel, Terra Nova, used by Scott on his last Antarctic expedition.The Aurora had seen service in both the Arctic and the Antarctic.In 1884, she was involved, unsuccessfully, in a race to rescue the Adolphus Greely party and reap the promised reward.In 1911, the Aurora was used by the Douglas Mawson Australian Expedition.By 1914, however, the ship was well past her prime.Leaking and overloaded, she left Hobart on Christmas morning after three days of what is described as mass confusion and a frantic rush to get ready.Eighteen dogs were the last addition to the cluttered deck load consisting of petrol, coal, sheep, and odds and ends.On January 7, the party sighted the Admiralty Range flanking the western shores of the Ross Sea.The following day they made out the snowy tip of Mount Erebus on Ross Island, the "promised

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueARCTICSame topicAsian American and Pacific HistoriesFrench-language works237,207