Inhibition of glutamine synthetase during ammonia exposure in rainbow trout indicates a high reserve capacity to prevent brain ammonia toxicity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glutamine synthetase (GSase), the enzyme that catalyses the conversion of glutamate and ammonia to glutamine, is present at high levels in vertebrate brain tissue and is thought to protect the brain from elevated ammonia concentrations. We tested the hypothesis that high brain GSase activity is critical in preventing accumulation of brain ammonia and glutamate during ammonia loading in the ammonia-intolerant rainbow trout. Trout pre-injected with saline or the GSase inhibitor methionine sulfoximine (MSOX, 6 mg kg(-1)), were exposed to 0, 670 or 1000 micromol l(-1) NH(4)Cl in the water for 24 and 96 h. Brain ammonia levels were 3- to 6-fold higher in ammonia-exposed fish relative to control fish and MSOX treatment did not alter this. Brain GSase activity was unaffected by ammonia exposure, while MSOX inhibited GSase activity by approximately 75%. Brain glutamate levels were lower and glutamine levels were higher in fish exposed to ammonia relative to controls. While MSOX treatment had little impact on brain glutamate, glutamine levels were significantly reduced by 96 h. With ammonia treatment, significant changes in the concentration of multiple other brain amino acids occurred and these changes were mostly reversed or eliminated with MSOX. Overall the changes in amino acid levels suggest that multiple enzymatic pathways can supply glutamate for the production of glutamine via GSase during ammonia exposure and that alternative transaminase pathways can be recruited for ammonia detoxification. Plasma cortisol levels increased 7- to 15-fold at 24 h in response to ammonia and MSOX did not exacerbate this stress response. These findings indicate that rainbow trout possess a relatively large reserve capacity for ammonia detoxification and for preventing glutamate accumulation during hyperammonaemic conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".