MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019023057 · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e31820cf1dd

Risk Factors Influencing Transfusion Rates in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

2011· article· en· W2019023057 on OpenAlex
Sarah E. Appleton, Adrienne Ngan, Blaine Kent, Steven F. Morris

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityUniversity of King's College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerioperativeBreast reconstructionBlood transfusionDIEP flapSurgeryOdds ratioAnesthesiaBreast cancerInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: As the popularity of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction grows, there remains little information on the transfusion rate of this more technically challenging procedure. The purpose of this study was to examine the perioperative blood loss and patient characteristics of women undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction in an attempt to identify independent risk factors that predict increased blood loss and transfusion requirements. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified 144 patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction performed at Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center between January of 2002 and July of 2009. Intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin and hematocrit drop, length of hospital stay, incidence of perioperative blood transfusions, and complications were reviewed. This study assessed the effects of older age, obesity, bilateral reconstruction, immediate reconstruction, tamoxifen treatment, and length of surgery on the incidence of perioperative blood transfusion and complications. RESULTS: A total of 18.8 percent of patients required perioperative blood transfusions. These patients were older and more obese, underwent more immediate and bilateral reconstructions, and had longer mean operative times and hospital stays. Patients who underwent lengthy bilateral DIEP reconstructions were at increased risk of receiving a perioperative blood transfusion (bilateral: relative risk, 2.4; odds ratio, 4.4; long surgery: relative risk, 3.9; odds ratio, 7.3). Blood transfusion recipients had an increased risk and greater odds of experiencing any postoperative complication (relative risk, 2.3; odds ratio, 3.4). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral reconstruction and length of surgery were the only factors to significantly increase the risk of perioperative blood transfusion. Patients receiving blood transfusions had an increased risk of experiencing a postoperative complication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it